What's New?
Email us at:
|
Robert Haaland
DogPAC Questionnaire
District 5
- What have you
done on behalf of the dog owning community and what will you do in the
future?
When I was younger, I worked as a Park Ranger for the East
Bay Regional Park District in Tilden Park, above Berkeley. Many park
visitors were people coming up the hill on the weekends and after
work to walk their dogs. In general, Tilden is an urban, multi-use
park where people and the Park staff interacted fairly cooperatively
in finding ways to accommodate all types of uses. I respect that you
have become a grassroots, powerful community force in San Francisco.
As a grassroots, community organizer I understand how difficult if
can be to move an agenda if you haven't mobilized. If elected Supervisor,
I will actively solicit your ideas and suggestions on relevant issues.
I will do my best to ensure that your perspectives are taken seriously.
While I know that supervisors' schedules are often unwieldy, I pledge
to periodically attend your meetings, report on the status of the
parks and dog policies, and respond to your questions.
- The only real
oversight mechanism the Board of Supervisors has with regard to the
operating departments is the power of the purse: that is, the Board
must approve the budget. Would you be prepared to withhold portions
of a Department's budget if the Department was managing the money poorly,
reporting to the Board inadequately, or failing to develop reasonable
public consensus? Please describe.
Yes. With a sagging economy, it is more important than ever
that the Board of Supervisors implement increased budgetary controls
and improved fiscal management. Poor departmental and fiscal oversight
ultimately harms San Francisco residents as mismanagement forces the
Board to consider cuts to vital services. I believe in zero-based
and performance-based budgeting. While I would certainly consider
withholding a portion of a department's budget for fiscal mismanagement,
I believe more lasting reforms must be implemented to prevent this
from occurring.
- Currently,
the Recreation and Park Department has 10-15% of the city's playing
fields locked up and chained shut. RPD is in the process of claiming
hundreds of acres of parkland as natural habitat areas where public
access will be very restricted if allowed at all. Critics have said
that the goal of the Rec & Park Department is Parks without People.
Will you work to promote public access to public parkland? How?
As a previous Park Ranger and a proponent of environmental issues,
I am supportive of the need to preserve natural habitat areas in
San Francisco. However, I also know how important open spaces and
parks are to preserving healthy households in the City. Only areas
containing legitimate, sensitive habitat areas should be restricted.
I will work to promote public access to public parkland in various
ways. First, I have always supported community-planning processes.
The City's citizen stakeholders voice their concerns and preferences
on this matter. Second, I think it's important to see what common
ground and compromises can be worked out with the environmental
community. In my years of organizing, I have found that such good
faith efforts produce far greater results than those won through
animosity. As Supervisor, I will work with all sides to assist in
identifying the best possible parkland solutions for San Francisco.
- Will you work
to promote tolerant, multi-purpose, shared-use of parks? How?
Yes. Parks serve San Franciscans in many ways. It is important
that the City identify the best formula to accommodate the greatest
number of people. I don't have a specific plan for promoting multi-purpose,
shared-use of parks. However, I can state that my background is a
good indicator that I will advocate for a community-based process
in establishing new policies for park use. I would be interested in
exploring new configurations for determining park policy. Ideas such
as district-based park planning might be useful in addressing multiple
uses and needs for neighborhood parks.
- Most of us
believe that it is reasonable to regulate certain incompatible uses
of public spaces. For example, most of us would agree that horses should
not be allowed on the golf course and dogs should not be allowed in
children's playgrounds.
Would you feel differently if you discovered that the dogs in a children's
playground belonged to the parents and their kids?
I can't honestly say whether this would change my opinion
or not. What immediately comes to mind is that other children may
be fearful of dogs. However, your point is well taken. I do understand
that a child with a dog is deprived of this recreational activity
if she/he isn't allowed to bring a dog to the playground.
- Do you think
the Recreation and Park Department provides adequate public process
for park policies? Would you be willing to intervene in Rec/Park business
if there were inadequate public process?
I think Rec and Park must improve their record regarding
public process. It has been disappointing and unacceptable to learn
that meetings times are not always widely circulated, that agendas
are not always available, and other such irregularities have occurred.
I can support a department that disagrees with public sentiment if
I know the reasons are sound, and I see that efforts to reach out
to the community are genuine. However, when the public process itself
has been inadequate, I would definitely be willing to intervene.
- Have you ever
visited on or more of the original 19 dog exercise areas approved by
the RPD over 20 years ago? Which ones? How would you characterize the
conditions you saw?
I had a dog for several years, but he died about seven
years ago. I lived next to Dolores Park and I took him there. Friends
of mine who are dog owners who have taken their dogs to exercise areas
have expressed to me their extreme displeasure with RPD about the
exercise areas
- Statistics
show that children are more likely to grow up with a family dog than
with both parents; that dog owner/guardians have lower blood pressure
and cholesterol levels; and that elderly pet owner/guardians are more
active and less depressed.
Do you believe that dogs play an important role in society? What
is your personal experience with dogs in your life - now or in the past?
I believe dogs play an invaluable role in society. I grew up with
a German Shepherd named Bunkee who died when I was eighteen. Since
I moved around a lot as a child, he was my closest friend.
When I worked at the SF Tenants Union, I worked closely with a
counselor to create handouts for tenants who had dogs as companions.
Over and over again, tenants, many of whom had emotional struggles,
described to me their sense that they could not live without their
dog. Under the ADA, their right to have a dog in their home was
protected and we showed the tenants how to establish to the landlord
their rights.
I have seen pet dogs serve as a child's first lesson in caring
for others, and I have seen dogs serve as vital companions to people
with AIDS. Many elderly residents with dogs feel safer, and have
loving companionship. Dogs are an undervalued asset in society today.
- San Francisco's
dog population is estimated by the Dept. of Animal Care and Control
to be between 100,000 and 120,000. Roughly 25% of the city's households
includes a dog. Many dog owner/guardians are single and/or elderly,
and recreation with their dog is their primary or sole form of socialization,
recreation and exercise.
Do you believe that off-leash recreation can be viewed as a benefit
for people - not just for their dogs?
Yes, I do believe various groups of people benefit from
off-leash recreation and exercise with their dogs.
- Do you believe
that walking a dog off-leash is a valid form of recreation on a par
with picnicking, Frisbee, hiking, bird watching, soccer, etc.?
Yes. While I had a dog, walking him was both a recreational activity
and sometimes my only exercise.
- What positive
things do you see about off-leash recreation in our parks?
San Francisco is sometimes viewed as unfriendly to families
and children. The presence of dogs, particularly off-leash dogs, presents
a wholesome, family-friendly view of the City.
|