What's New?
Email us at:
|
Pat Lakey
DogPAC Questionnaire
District 7
- What have you
done on behalf of the dog owning community and what will you do in the
future?
Voted against the leash law and will continue to support
any efforts to aid the community.
- The only real
oversight mechanism the Board of Supervisors has with regard to the
operating departments is the power of the purse: that is, the Board
must approve the budget. Would you be prepared to withhold portions
of a Department's budget if the Department was managing the money poorly,
reporting to the Board inadequately, or failing to develop reasonable
public consensus? Please describe.
Yes! I think all departments should be held accountable
for their budget and if they are not performing or following the rules
then they must be penalized.
- Currently,
the Recreation and Park Department has 10-15% of the city's playing
fields locked up and chained shut. RPD is in the process of claiming
hundreds of acres of parkland as natural habitat areas where public
access will be very restricted if allowed at all. Critics have said
that the goal of the Rec & Park Department is Parks without People.
Will you work to promote public access to public parkland? How?
Yes! I think it is very necessary for people to have a
place to get away from the complicated lives we led. Trails and recreation
areas could be set up without harming the open space.
- Will you work
to promote tolerant, multi-purpose, shared-use of parks? How?
Yes! I think we need to have space for pedestrians, bikes,
skaters, etc. We need to make trails that are only for Dogs, some
for dirt bike riders and others that are only for road bikes and skates
and such. In areas that have limited space the trails could have special
times for each use.
- Most of us
believe that it is reasonable to regulate certain incompatible uses
of public spaces. For example, most of us would agree that horses should
not be allowed on the golf course and dogs should not be allowed in
children's playgrounds.
Would you feel differently if you discovered that the dogs in a children's
playground belonged to the parents and their kids?
I always believe that it is not the dogs we have to worry
about but the owners. Dogs behave according to the environment they
are raised in. If the owner lets the dog behave badly at home then
he/she will do the same in public so it would depend on the dog.
- Do you think
the Recreation and Park Department provides adequate public process
for park policies? Would you be willing to intervene in Rec/Park business
if there were inadequate public process?
YES, Public process is very important to assure the "public"
gets what it needs in terms of recreation. For instance you wouldn't
want to put a basketball court next to a senior center. A lawn bowling
green with a flat path and lots of shady benches would be better.
- Have you ever
visited on or more of the original 19 dog exercise areas approved by
the RPD over 20 years ago? Which ones? How would you characterize the
conditions you saw?
Yes. I used to take my dog to the one by the buffalo paddock in
Golden Gate Park. I thought it was in good shape and most of the
people were great.
- Statistics
show that children are more likely to grow up with a family dog than
with both parents; that dog owner/guardians have lower blood pressure
and cholesterol levels; and that elderly pet owner/guardians are more
active and less depressed.
Do you believe that dogs play an important role in society? What
is your personal experience with dogs in your life - now or in the past?
I think dogs are an integral part of society since early
history dogs have been companions to man/woman. I have had two dogs
one passed away of old age and Jaeger is still living with her Mom
in Walnut Creek.
- San Francisco's
dog population is estimated by the Dept. of Animal Care and Control
to be between 100,000 and 120,000. Roughly 25% of the city's households
includes a dog. Many dog owner/guardians are single and/or elderly,
and recreation with their dog is their primary or sole form of socialization,
recreation and exercise.
Do you believe that off-leash recreation can be viewed as a benefit
for people - not just for their dogs?
Yes dogs have to be able to run and so do their owners.
Certain areas should be set-aside for this. For instance Ocean beach
between kirkham and Ortega could be free roam for dogs and in certain
areas in parks. We also need more waste stations.
- Do you believe
that walking a dog off-leash is a valid form of recreation on a par
with picnicking, Frisbee, hiking, bird watching, soccer, etc.?
Yes.
- What positive
things do you see about off-leash recreation in our parks?
Interaction between the dogs for socializing and also for the owners
who as it was stated earlier are usually single or elderly. Sometimes
the dogs can bring the people together.
- Do you believe
that public authorities should make regulations to accommodate people
who are afraid of dogs?
I don't think we need more regulations just education.
Dog owners need to be aware when someone shows signs of fear not to
teas the person but give them space and respect. These fears are usually
from a bad experience with a dog we need to give good ones to help
them overcome their fear.
- Some people
have fears, phobias, and dislikes of other people in our society. Gays,
African-Americans, Asian Americans, dog owners, and teenagers are some
targets of such fears. Is it appropriate to restrict the access
to public places of such groups simply because some people are afraid
of them or dislike their behavior in public?
No
- If you answered
questions 12 and 13 differently, please explain.
N/A
- Most people
agree that there is too much rudeness in public these days, which sometimes
escalates into violence, such as "road rage". There is certainly more
rudeness than we would like in our public parks these days between joggers,
bicyclists, dog owners, parents, etc. Conflict and rudeness may occur
when people share limited park resources. What is the appropriate
response by public agencies to individual conflict or reported "rudeness"
in parks?
Follow the law. If someone is acting foolish they need
to be held accountable.
- San Francisco's
dog bite rate is about 40% of the national average - and most bites
occur in or around the home - not in public spaces. Many, many more
children are injured in sports and playground accidents than by the
family or neighborhood dog. Sergeant Herndon of the SFPD "Doggy Court"
attributes SF's low bite rate to increasingly responsible dog owners
who socialize and exercise their dogs off-leash.
Is this a surprise to you? Does it change your concept of the value
of adequate off-leash areas for everyone, not just dog owners and their
dogs?
This does not surprise me. Dogs and people need to socialize
in order to know their limitations and get along.
- Through its
Natural Areas Program, the Rec/park Department is spending thousands
of dollars cutting down healthy Eucalyptus trees because they are not
native. At the same time, through its Construction Program, Rec/Park
is spending hundreds of thousands of dollars (almost $200,000 in Holly
Park alone) to purchase and plant Canary Island palm trees. Does
this make any sense to you?
NO! The only time I think we should cut down trees is if
there is a danger to life or property and we should try to plant native
species in our parks.
- A book-length
study conducted and published by the Urban Land Institute shows that
the San Francisco Rec/Park Department is among the 3 best-funded big-city
Rec/Park Departments in the country. Nonetheless, even in strained economic
times such as these, when city heath and other services are being cut,
the Board of Supervisors added $1 million to Rec/Park's budget.
Do you think this is good government?
Our parks are about 150 gardeners short and need lots of
maintenance and upgrades. Do I think they should cut health care to
fund the park? No, but I do think the parks are very important to
mental health and providing a sanctuary to escape from the strain
of modern life..
- Supervisors
are particularly susceptible to what looks like bribery by city agencies.
If a city agency offers to build or acquire a new park or renovate an
old one, or to change a street-cleaning schedule in a Supervisor's district,
in return for loyal support of the agency, many Supervisors go for the
deal. How
do you think we can curtail this kind of bribery?
Put people in office who are a real, hard working, citizen.
Not career politicians looking for their next job.
|